Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Giso Asgari v. Abbas Asgari.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Giso Asgari v. Abbas Asgari Anchor | green | “husband will not be permitted to approbate and reprobate, ascribing error to an act by the trial court that comported with his representations.” | 8 |
| 2 | Manns v. Commonwealth | green | “no litigant . . . will be permitted to approbate and reprobate - to invite error . . . and then to take advantage of the situation created by his own wrong.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.