Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Donelson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Donelson Anchor | green | “sentences were void to the extent they were ordered to be served concurrently.” | 5 |
| 2 | People v. Garcia | green | “premised on the erroneous assumption that there is a valid sentence to increase.” | 5 |
| 3 | People v. Brown | green | “while a sentence, or portion thereof, not authorized by statute is void it is void only to the extent that it exceeds what the law permits” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. Harvey | green | “because defendant challenges his extended-term sentence on the basis that the judgment is void, his challenge is proper and not restricted by the two-year limitation period in section 2-1401” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.