Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Kelley v. Commonwealth.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kelley v. Commonwealth Anchor | green | “the determination of whether an accused has been denied the constitutional right to a speedy trial requires 'a difficult and sensitive balancing process' in which the court examines on an ad hoc basis the conduct of both the state and the accused which led to a delay in prosecut…” | 8 |
| 2 | Howard v. Com. | green | “length of delay, reason for delay, defendant's assertion of his right, and prejudice to the defendant.” | 5 |
| 3 | Howard v. Com. | green | “a claim of a violation of speedy trial rights under the federal constitution is resolved by the balancing of four factors - length of delay, reason for delay, defendant's assertion of his right, and prejudice to the defendant.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.