Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 120 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Lott.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Lott Anchor | green | “what the evidence has shown and what reasonable inferences may be drawn therefrom.” | 66 |
| 2 | State v. Smith | green | “the touchstone of analysis is the fairness of the trial, not the culpability of the prosecutor.” | 23 |
| 3 | State v. Jones | green | “whether remarks were improper and, if so, whether they prejudicially affected substantial rights of the accused.” | 18 |
| 4 | State v. Stevens, Unpublished Decision (11-21-2003) | neutral | “moreover, because isolated instances of prosecutorial misconduct are harmless, the closing argument must be viewed in its entirety to determine whether the defendant has been prejudiced.” | 7 |
| 5 | State v. Lorraine | green | “moreover, because isolated instances of prosecutorial misconduct are harmless, the closing argument must be viewed in its entirety to determine whether the defendant has been prejudiced.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.