Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Jeffrey D. Wells v. Commonwealth of Virginia.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jeffrey D. Wells v. Commonwealth of Virginia Anchor | green | “on appeal, we review the evidence in the light most favorable to the commonwealth, granting to it all reasonable inferences fairly deducible therefrom.” | 9 |
| 2 | Beshah v. Commonwealth | green | “substitute our judgment for that of the trier of fact.” | 4 |
| 3 | Bruce Edison Parham v. Commonwealth of Virginia | green | “in our review of the sufficiency of the evidence, we must affirm the conviction unless the trial court was plainly wrong or the conviction lacked evidence to support it.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.