Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Shawley v. Shea-Ball Construction Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shawley v. Shea-Ball Construction Co. Anchor | green | “an employee must assert against his employer any claim that he might have for any injury growing out of the accident.” | 4 |
| 2 | BAY CONCRETE CONST. CO., INC. v. Davis | green | “although we are not bound by the commission's legal analysis in this or prior cases,' we give great weight to the commission's construction of the act, and we defer to the commission's factual findings if supported by credible evidence in the record.” | 3 |
| 3 | Garcia v. Mantech International Corp. | green | “be liberally construed to advance its purpose . . . of compensating employees for accidental injuries resulting from the hazards of the employment,” | 3 |
| 4 | Shawley v. Shea-Ball Construction Co. | green | “an examination of the medical reports and other documents submitted within the statute of limitations period from the date of the accident failed to disclose any reference to an injury to shawley's back or to his right leg or right ankle” | 3 |
| 5 | Shawley v. Shea-Ball Construction Co. | green | “the treatment necessary to effect a cure of the claimant and to minimize the employer's liability.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.