Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Lamm v. State Street Bank & Trust Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lamm v. State Street Bank & Trust Co. Anchor | green | “under florida law, banks ordinarily do not owe fiduciary duties to their customers.” | 4 |
| 2 | Maxwell v. First United Bank | green | “premised upon the specific factual situation surrounding the transaction and the relationship of the parties' and exists where 'confidence is reposed by one party and a trust accepted by the other.” | 3 |
| 3 | Lanz v. Resolution Trust Corp. | green | “in order for a confidential or fiduciary relationship to exist under florida law, there must be substantial evidence showing some dependency by one party and some undertaking by the other party to advise, counsel, and protect the weaker party.” | 3 |
| 4 | Greenberg v. MIAMI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL RES. INST., INC. | green | “premised upon the specific factual situation surrounding the transaction and the relationship of the parties' and exists where 'confidence is reposed by one party and a trust accepted by the other.” | 3 |
| 5 | Hogan v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance | green | “a fiduciary relationship may be either express or implied.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.