Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Abshire.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Abshire Anchor | green | “in this determination, all evidence is considered in the light most favorable to the state, and the state receives the benefit of every reasonable inference supported by that evidence.” | 5 |
| 2 | State v. Chapman | green | “whether the state presented substantial evidence in support of each element of the charged offense.” | 4 |
| 3 | State v. McNeil | green | “substantial evidence inquiry examines the sufficiency of the evidence presented but not its weight,” | 4 |
| 4 | State v. Abshire | green | “substantial evidence is relevant evidence that a reasonable person might accept as adequate, or would consider necessary to support a particular conclusion.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.