Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re Is.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re Is Anchor | green | “the general rule is that appellate courts do not consider moot questions.” | 4 |
| 2 | In Re Is | green | “consistent with its requirement that appellate courts address only those rulings that 'may affect the proceedings below,' ocga 5-6-34 (d) expressly provides that 'nothing in this subsection shall require the appellate court to pass upon questions which are rendered moot.” | 3 |
| 3 | In Re Is | green | “deprivation order is undoubtedly of great concern to the father, the case does not contain an issue of significant public concern.” | 3 |
| 4 | In the Interest of T. H. | green | “it is axiomatic that each individual deprivation order must be supported by clear and convincing evidence that the child at issue is currently deprived, i.e., at the time of the hearing.” | 3 |
| 5 | In the Interest of T. H. | green | “the exceptions to the 'mootness rule' are when a ruling addresses an issue of significant public concern; involves an alleged error that is capable of repetition in future proceedings, yet evades appellate review; or creates collateral consequences that will continue to plague t…” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.