Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 623 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Czekalski, Loni v. Peters, Mary.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Czekalski, Loni v. Peters, Mary Anchor | green | “eschew making credibility determinations or weighing the evidence.” | 227 |
| 2 | Ross J. Laningham v. United States Navy | green | “required to provide evidence that would permit a reasonable jury to find” | 111 |
| 3 | Holcomb, Christine v. Powell, Donald | green | “a fact is 'material' if a dispute over it might affect the outcome of a suit under the governing law; factual disputes that are 'irrelevant or unnecessary' do not affect the summary judgment determination.” | 106 |
| 4 | Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Ralph L. Stanley, Administrator, Urban Mass Transportation Administration | green | “bears the heavy burden of establishing that the merits of his case are so clear that expedited action is justified.” | 81 |
| 5 | Freedman v. MCI Telecommunications Corp. | green | “a scintilla of evidence to support his claims.” | 67 |
| 6 | Freedman v. MCI Telecommunications Corp. | green | “a scintilla of evidence to support her claims.” | 31 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.