Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Maldonado.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Maldonado Anchor | green | “knowledge of facts and circumstances 'sufficient to support a reasonable belief that an offense has been or is being committed” | 4 |
| 2 | Matter of Victor M. | green | “acting other than as a player, . . . engages in conduct which materially aids any form of gambling activity” | 3 |
| 3 | People v. Jones | green | “based upon the evidence presented at the suppression hearing” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. Mack | green | “an out-of-court statement made by a witness that is consistent with that witness's trial testimony is generally inadmissible as hearsay” | 3 |
| 5 | People v. Lloyd | green | “it is well settled than an appellate court may not uphold a police action on a theory not argued before the suppression court” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.