Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Gonzalez.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Gonzalez Anchor | green | “a duty to exercise reasonable care to protect her from dangerous conditions in the store known or discoverable to it.” | 4 |
| 2 | Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Rangel | red | “not the standard ms. rangel had to meet.” | 3 |
| 3 | Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Rangel | red | “substance had been on the floor for such a period of time that it would have been discovered and removed by the defendant in the exercise of ordinary care.” | 3 |
| 4 | Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Gonzalez | green | “the harsh reality is that if the plaintiff cannot prove facts to support her cause of action, there is simply no recovery.” | 3 |
| 5 | Schaefer v. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n | green | “the harsh reality is that if the plaintiff cannot prove facts to support her cause of action, there is simply no recovery.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.