Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re Adoption of B J.H..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re Adoption of B J.H. Anchor | green | “extrinsic fraud 'is some act or conduct of the prevailing party which has prevented a fair submission of the controversy.” | 5 |
| 2 | Costello v. McFadden | green | “in contrast, intrinsic fraud inheres in the judgment itself; it includes, for example, false testimony and fraudulent exhibits.” | 3 |
| 3 | Mauer v. Rohde | green | “a bribed judge, dishonest attorney representing the defrauded client, or a false promise of compromise.” | 3 |
| 4 | Mauer v. Rohde | green | “examples of extrinsic fraud are a bribed judge, dishonest attorney representing the defrauded client, or a false promise of compromise.” | 3 |
| 5 | Graves v. Graves | green | “fraudulent concealment of his property” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.