Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 119 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Brandon Cleveland and Isiah Jackson v. Caplaw Enterprises, Docket No. 05-4643-Cv.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brandon Cleveland and Isiah Jackson v. Caplaw Enterprises, Docket No. 05-4643-Cv Anchor | green | “the standard for addressing a rule 12(c) motion for judgment on the pleadings is the same as that for a rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.” | 54 |
| 2 | Todd v. Exxon Corporation | green | “not whether a plaintiff will ultimately prevail but whether the claimant is entitled to offer evidence to support the claims.” | 40 |
| 3 | Todd v. Exxon Corporation | green | “the issue is not whether a plaintiff will ultimately prevail but whether the claimant is entitled to offer evidence to support the claims.” | 19 |
| 4 | The Hertz Corporation v. The City Of New York | green | “the complaint cannot state any set of facts that would entitle the plaintiff to relief will it grant dismissal pursuant to rule 12(b)(6)” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.