Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Speicher v. Columbia Township Board of Trustees.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Speicher v. Columbia Township Board of Trustees Anchor | green | “contemplates an ongoing violation, precisely the circumstances in which injunctive relief is appropriate.” | 6 |
| 2 | Nicholas v. Meridian Charter Township Board | green | “merely because a violation of the oma has occurred does not automatically mean that an injunction must issue restraining the public body from using the violative procedure in the future.” | 4 |
| 3 | Ridenour v. BD. OF EDUC. OF CITY OF DEARBORN SCH. DIST. | red | “and its progeny to the extent that those cases allow for the recovery of attorney fees and costs under mcl 15.271(4) when injunctive relief was not obtained, equivalent or otherwise.” | 3 |
| 4 | Speicher v. Columbia Township Board of Trustees | green | “a public official who intentionally violates this act shall be personally liable in a civil action for actual and exemplary damages of not more than 500.00 total, plus court costs and actual attorney fees . . . .” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.