Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 119 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In re C.R.S..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In re C.R.S. Anchor | green | “that care which (1) is geared to the particularized needs of the child and (2) at a minimum, is likely to prevent serious injury to the child.” | 26 |
| 2 | In the Interest of A.B. | green | “that care which (1) is geared to the particularized needs of the child and (2) at a minimum, is likely to prevent serious injury to the child.” | 23 |
| 3 | In re C.R.S. | green | “so clear, direct, weighty, and convincing as to enable the trier of facts to come to a clear conviction, without hesitancy, of the truth of the precise facts in issue.” | 19 |
| 4 | In the Interest R.T. | green | “a child will only be declared dependent when he is presently without proper parental care and when such care is not immediately available.” | 18 |
| 5 | In the Interest of A.B. | green | “so clear, direct, weighty, and convincing as to enable the trier of facts to come to a clear conviction, without hesitancy, of the truth of the precise facts in issue.” | 12 |
| 6 | In re S.S. D.O.B. | green | “it is not for this court, but for the trial court as fact finder, to determine whether a child's removal from her family was clearly necessary.” | 9 |
| 7 | In re S.S. D.O.B. | green | “it is not for this court, but for the trial court as factfinder, to determine whether a child's removal from her family was clearly necessary.” | 6 |
| 8 | In re C.R.S. | green | “evidence has been defined as testimony that is” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.