Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Batchelder v. Allied Stores Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Batchelder v. Allied Stores Corp. Anchor | green | “coextensive with 42 u.s.c. 1983 , except that the federal statute requires state action whereas its state counterpart does not.” | 5 |
| 2 | Batchelder v. Allied Stores Corp. | green | “are 'coextensive with 42 u.s.c. 1983 , except that the federal statute requires state action whereas its state counterpart does not.” | 4 |
| 3 | Ali v. University of Massachusetts Medical Center | green | “the application to another of such force, either physical or moral, as to constrain him to do against his will something he would not otherwise have done.” | 4 |
| 4 | Cachopa v. Town of Stoughton | green | “to establish a claim of intentional interference with contractual relationship, thomas must show (1) that he had a contract with a third party, (2) that the defendants knowingly induced the third party to break that contract, (3) that the defendants' interference was improper in…” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.