Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 119 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Sameric Corporation Of Delaware, Inc. v. City Of Philadelphia.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sameric Corporation Of Delaware, Inc. v. City Of Philadelphia Anchor | green | “when the plaintiff knew or should have known of the injury upon which its action is based.” | 56 |
| 2 | Ivan Davis v. Kevin Beals | green | “although the statute of limitations is an affirmative defense, sua sponte dismissal is appropriate when 'the defense is obvious from the face of the complaint and no further factual record is required to be developed.” | 32 |
| 3 | Sameric Corporation Of Delaware, Inc. v. City Of Philadelphia | green | “a section 1983 cause of action accrues when the plaintiff knew or should have known of the injury upon which its action is based.” | 31 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.