Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Illinois State Treausrer v. Illinois Workers' Compensation Commission.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Illinois State Treausrer v. Illinois Workers' Compensation Commission Anchor | green | “to vest the courts with jurisdiction to review commission decisions, strict compliance with the provisions of the act is necessary and must affirmatively appear in the record.” | 4 |
| 2 | Equity Residential Properties Management Corp. v. Nasolo | green | “it was based entirely on documentary evidence.” | 3 |
| 3 | Curtis v. Pekin Insurance Co. | green | “the deficiency in the proof of service of which plaintiff complains had no substantial effect on the disposition of the case below” | 3 |
| 4 | Jones v. Industrial Commission | green | “no request for a summons may be filed and no summons shall issue” | 3 |
| 5 | In re Marriage of Morse | green | “doubts as to the timeliness of appeals should be resolved so to favor review in the appellate court.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.