Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from ANACOSTIA RIVERKEEPER, INC. v. Jackson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ANACOSTIA RIVERKEEPER, INC. v. Jackson Anchor | green | “even an agency 'decision of less than ideal clarity' should be upheld 'if the agency's path may be reasonably discerned.” | 5 |
| 2 | Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde Community of Oregon v. Jewell | green | “determine if the agency's interpretation is permissible, and if so, defer to it.” | 5 |
| 3 | Agape Church, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission | green | “relied on factors which congress has not intended it to consider, entirely failed to consider an important aspect of the problem, offered an explanation for its decision that runs counter to the evidence before the agency, or is so implausible that it could not be ascribed to a …” | 3 |
| 4 | Agape Church, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission | green | “runs counter to the evidence before the agency, or is so implausible that it could not be ascribed to a difference in view or the product of agency expertise.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.