Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 118 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Edwards v. Commonwealth.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Edwards v. Commonwealth Anchor | green | “making one specific argument on an issue does not preserve a separate legal point on the same issue for review.” | 75 |
| 2 | Haugen v. SHENANDOAH VALLEY SOCIAL SERVICES | green | “the circuit court's ruling on a motion for a continuance will be rejected on appeal only upon a showing of abuse of discretion and resulting prejudice to the movant.” | 22 |
| 3 | Haugen v. SHENANDOAH VALLEY SOCIAL SERVICES | green | “the decision to grant a motion for a continuance is within the sound discretion of the circuit court and must be considered in view of the circumstances unique to each case.” | 16 |
| 4 | Haugen v. SHENANDOAH VALLEY SOCIAL SERVICES | green | “in view of the circumstances unique to each case.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.