Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Harris.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Harris Anchor | green | “whether the evidence is sufficient as a matter of law to support a conviction involves a determination of whether the state met its burden of production at trial.” | 8 |
| 2 | State v. Watkins | green | “essentially assumes the state's witnesses testified truthfully and determines if that testimony and any other evidence presented at trial satisfies each element of the crime.” | 4 |
| 3 | State v. Richey | green | “attacks the credibility of the evidence presented and questions whether the state met its burden of persuasion.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.