Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Roy v. Lampert.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Roy v. Lampert Anchor | green | “pro se status, on its own, is not enough to warrant equitable tolling.” | 6 |
| 2 | Bills v. Clark | green | “lest the exceptions swallow the rule,” | 3 |
| 3 | United States v. Buckles | green | “we have followed a tradition in which courts of equity have sought to 'relieve hardships which, from time to time, arise from a hard and fast adherence' to more absolute legal rules, which, if strictly applied, threaten the 'evils of archaic rigidity.” | 3 |
| 4 | Rudin v. State | green | “must be examined in a separate post-conviction proceeding at which time rudin's post-conviction attorney will examine the entire record, interview all relevant witnesses and present the matter to the district court for a full and complete airing and decision.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.