Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from City Of Chanute, Kansue, v. Williams Natural Gas Company.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | City Of Chanute, Kansue, v. Williams Natural Gas Company Anchor | green | “the danger of prejudice to the nonmoving party, the length of the delay and its potential impact on judicial proceedings, the reason for the delay, including whether it was within the reasonable control of the movant, and whether the movant acted in good faith.” | 7 |
| 2 | Mirpuri v. Act Manufacturing, Inc. | green | “takes account of a narrow class of cases in which a traditional 'excusable neglect' analysis would be inapposite.” | 4 |
| 3 | Theodore R. Gooch v. Skelly Oil Company, a Corporation | green | “absence of circumstances that are unique and extraordinary.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.