Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Texas Manufactured Housing Ass'n v. Nederland.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Texas Manufactured Housing Ass'n v. Nederland Anchor | green | “the mere fact that a statute has the effect of benefitting a local industry while burdening a separate interstate industry does not in itself establish that the statute is discriminatory.” | 3 |
| 2 | United States v. Cajun Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. | green | “being peripheral, may not have received the full and careful consideration of the court that uttered it.” | 3 |
| 3 | Gochicoa v. Johnson | green | “being peripheral, may not have received the full and careful consideration of the court that uttered it.” | 3 |
| 4 | Ford Motor Co. v. Texas Department of Transportation | green | “acting in the capacity of a dealer” | 3 |
| 5 | Abrams v. Jones | green | “must attempt to give effect to every word and phrase if it is reasonable to do so.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.