Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from JUSTISS OIL COMPANY, INC v. KERR-McGEE REFINING CORPORATION.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JUSTISS OIL COMPANY, INC v. KERR-McGEE REFINING CORPORATION Anchor | green | “and when 'there are two permissible views of the evidence, the fact-finder's choice between them cannot be clearly erroneous.” | 4 |
| 2 | Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Garcia | green | “money saved by not complying with the law, as well as any profits made from food and drink sales associated with customers who stayed and watched the fight.” | 4 |
| 3 | J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Brady | green | “as the statute 'does not require identification of the precise means used to accomplish the piracy of a satellite signal.” | 4 |
| 4 | J&J Sports Productions, Incorporated v. Mandell Family Ventures, LLC | green | “one-way transmission to subscribers of (i) video programming, or (ii) other programming service,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.