Topic: it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #2605

7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 117 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Richardson, Roy Dale v. United States.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Richardson, Roy Dale v. United States Anchor
cadc · 1999
green “it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.” 26
2 Committee on the Judiciary v. Donald McGahn, II
cadc · 2020
green “one element of the case-or-controversy requirement is that plaintiffs must establish that they have standing to sue.” 23
3 Chaplaincy of Full Gospel Churches v. United States Navy
cadc · 2008
green “article iii of the united states constitution limits the judicial power to deciding 'cases and controversies.” 22
4 Committee on the Judiciary v. Donald McGahn, II
cadc · 2020
green “(1) suffered an injury in fact, (2) that is fairly traceable to the challenged conduct of the defendant, and (3) that is likely to be redressed by a favorable judicial decision.” 19
5 Lindsey v. United States
dcd · 2006
green “the plaintiff bears the burden of establishing the factual predicates of jurisdiction by a preponderance of the evidence.” 12
6 Zivotofsky, Menachem v. Secretary of State
cadc · 2006
green “the supreme court has recognized that 'congress may enact statutes creating legal rights, the invasion of which creates standing, even though no injury would exist without the statute.” 4

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check