Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from McClure v. Ashcroft.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | McClure v. Ashcroft Anchor | green | “in the absence of standing, there is no 'case or controversy' between the plaintiff and defendant which serves as the basis for the exercise of judicial power under article iii of the constitution.” | 5 |
| 2 | McClure v. Ashcroft | green | “it is well settled that unless a plaintiff has standing, a federal district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to address the merits of the case.” | 5 |
| 3 | Rims Barber v. Phil Bryant | green | “future injuries can provide the basis for standing, but they 'must be certainly impending to constitute injury in fact,' and 'allegations of possible future injury are not sufficient.' an injury based on a 'speculative chain of possibilities' does not confer article iii standing.” | 3 |
| 4 | Levy v. La. Dep't of Pub. Safety & Corr. & James Leblanc | green | “a plaintiff must show that "they face a palpable present or future harm, not harm that is 'conjectural or hypothetical.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.