Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Brobst v. Brobst.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brobst v. Brobst Anchor | green | “give recognition and protection to terrorist groups” | 3 |
| 2 | Ex Parte Quirin | green | “not subject to the law of war.” | 3 |
| 3 | Johnson v. Eisentrager | green | “subjects of a foreign state at war with the united states.” | 3 |
| 4 | Jose Padilla v. C.T. Hanft, U.S.N. Commander, Consolidated Naval Brig. | green | “an appearance that the government may be attempting to avoid consideration of our decision by the supreme court” | 3 |
| 5 | Padilla v. Hanft | green | “is inapposite here because padilla, unlike milligan, associated with, and has taken up arms against the forces of the united states on behalf of, an enemy of the united states.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.