Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 117 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co. Anchor | green | “an ultimate disposition of an individual claim entered in the course of a multiple claims action.” | 43 |
| 2 | Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co. | green | “not all final judgments on individual claims should be immediately appealable, even if they are in some sense separable from the remaining unresolved claims.” | 40 |
| 3 | Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co. | green | “it must be a 'judgment' in the sense that it is a decision upon a cognizable claim for relief, and it must be 'final' in the sense that it is 'an ultimate disposition of an individual claim entered in the course of a multiple claims action.” | 20 |
| 4 | Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKey | green | “the one most likely to be familiar with the case and with any justifiable reasons for delay.” | 8 |
| 5 | Lorraine C. Cullen v. Joseph P. Margiotta, Jr. | green | “granted only if there exists 'some danger of hardship or injustice through delay which would be alleviated by immediate appeal,” | 3 |
| 6 | Nikita Shonta Petties,appellees v. District of Columbia,appellants | green | “the district court functions as a dispatcher, determining in its sound discretion when a claim should proceed on to appellate resolution and when it should await its fellows.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.