Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Group Life & Health Insurance v. Royal Drug Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Group Life & Health Insurance v. Royal Drug Co. Anchor | green | “the starting point in any case involving the meaning of a statute is the language of the statute itself.” | 11 |
| 2 | Mills Music, Inc. v. Snyder | green | “in construing a federal statute, it is appropriate to assume that the ordinary meaning of the language that congress employed 'accurately expresses its legislative purpose.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.