Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Anderson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Anderson Anchor | green | “he controlled the manner of sales, set prices, or claimed the right to a larger share of proceeds.” | 6 |
| 2 | United States v. Damato | green | “a defendant may be eligible for the leader or organizer enhancement if he leads or organizes even one other participant.” | 4 |
| 3 | United States v. Wardell | green | “the key to determining whether a defendant qualifies as an organizer is not direct control but relative responsibility.” | 4 |
| 4 | United States v. Sallis | green | “control, organization, and responsibility for the actions of other individuals” | 1 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.