Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Jerome Messer v. Raymond Roberts.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jerome Messer v. Raymond Roberts Anchor | green | “accept the jury's resolution of the evidence as long as it is within the bounds of reason.” | 5 |
| 2 | Brown v. Sirmons | green | “applies both 28 u.s.c. 2254 (d)(1) and (d)(2) when reviewing sufficiency of the evidence on habeas.” | 4 |
| 3 | Jerome Messer v. Raymond Roberts | green | “must 'accept the jury's resolution of the evidence as long as it is within the bounds of reason.” | 3 |
| 4 | Jerome Messer v. Raymond Roberts | green | “the court may not weigh conflicting evidence nor consider the credibility of witnesses.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.