Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Lattab v. Ashcroft.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lattab v. Ashcroft Anchor | green | “little difficulty in concluding that the government's interpretation satisfies” | 3 |
| 2 | Lattab v. Ashcroft | green | “providing a mechanical procedure for the reinstatement of prior orders is entirely consistent with iirira's purpose” | 3 |
| 3 | Santiago VALDERRAMA-FONSECA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent | green | “it is apparent that congress knew how to make provisions of iirira applicable to pending proceedings when it wanted to” | 3 |
| 4 | United States v. Fidel Luna-Madellaga | green | “an alien who illegally reenters the united states while under an order of removal has already received a full and fair hearing . . . .” | 3 |
| 5 | Ernesto Salgado-Diaz v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General, Ernesto Salgado-Diaz v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General | green | “a full and fair hearing of the alien's claims and a reasonable opportunity to present evidence on his behalf,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.