Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Edward L. Powell.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Edward L. Powell Anchor | green | “we review the district court's exercise of jurisdiction de novo.” | 4 |
| 2 | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lonnie G. SCHMIDT, Defendant-Appellant | green | “the conditions of section 3583(i) apply only when the revocation of supervised release occurs after the term of supervised release has expired.” | 4 |
| 3 | United States v. Dante Vargas-Amaya | green | “supported by oath or affirmation” | 4 |
| 4 | United States v. Hector Verduzco, AKA Andres Juan Gutierrez, Jr., AKA John Doe | green | “the district court's decision to revoke a term of supervised release is reviewed for an abuse of discretion.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.