Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Don Eugene Siegelman.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Don Eugene Siegelman Anchor | green | “if the defendant does so, prejudice to the defendant is presumed and the burden shifts to the government to show 'that the jurors' consideration of extrinsic evidence was harmless to the defendant.” | 3 |
| 2 | United States v. Wilson Hopson Irvin | green | “judgments of acquittal are hearsay.” | 3 |
| 3 | United States v. Wilson Hopson Irvin | green | “unlike judgments of conviction, which may be admitted under rule 803(22) of the federal rules of evidence for some purposes, and used for impeachment under rule 609, judgments of acquittal are not covered by an exception to the rule against admission of hearsay.” | 3 |
| 4 | United States v. Daniel J. Leichtnam | green | “knowingly using and carrying a firearm: to wit, a mossberg rifle” | 3 |
| 5 | United States v. Wesley Anthony McIntosh | green | “the specific type of firearm is not an element of the offense.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.