Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Edgardo A. Gonzalez, Jr., Cross-Appellant v. C.Y. Benavides, Jr., Cross-Appellees.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Edgardo A. Gonzalez, Jr., Cross-Appellant v. C.Y. Benavides, Jr., Cross-Appellees Anchor | green | “that narrow band of fragile relationships requiring for job security loyalty at the expense of unfettered speech.” | 3 |
| 2 | James Elliott and Joseph Defley v. Leander H. Perez, Jr., Etc., Eugene E. Leon, Jr., Etc., and Frank Klein | green | “detailed facts supporting the contention that the plea of immunity cannot be sustained.” | 3 |
| 3 | Marta Carbonell v. Louisiana Dept. Of Health & Human Resources, Secretary of the Louisiana Dept. Of Health & Human Resources | green | “the demands of comity, continuity in the law, and essential justice.” | 3 |
| 4 | Leroy J. Matherne, Cross-Appellant v. Charles C. Wilson, Cross-Appellees | green | “an objectively reasonable view of the facts” | 3 |
| 5 | Harrington v. Harris | green | “a substantial or motivating factor” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.