Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Pupillo v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pupillo v. United States Anchor | green | “did not lessen the responsibility of mr. cali for royal's paca violations.” | 3 |
| 2 | Pupillo v. United States | green | “section 499a(9) is an irrebuttable statement that an officer, director, or holder of more than ten percent of the outstanding stock of a corporation is responsibly connected with that corporation or association.” | 3 |
| 3 | In Re Lombardo Fruit And Produce Company | green | “from the 'sharp practices of financially irresponsible and unscrupulous brokers in perishable commodities.” | 3 |
| 4 | Abl Produce, Inc. v. United States Department of Agriculture | green | “the 45-day suspension may destroy or seriously hamper the produce company's relationships with its customers, who depend upon daily services” | 3 |
| 5 | Abl Produce, Inc. v. United States Department of Agriculture | green | “without justification in fact.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.