Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Albert L. Lawrence v. National Westminster Bank New Jersey, Albert Lawrence.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Albert L. Lawrence v. National Westminster Bank New Jersey, Albert Lawrence Anchor | green | “provides evidence 'such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the non-moving party.” | 7 |
| 2 | Equimark Commercial Finance Company v. C.I.T. Financial Services Corporation (Formerly Universal C.I.T. Credit Corporation) | green | “rest upon mere allegations, general denials, or ... vague statements” | 4 |
| 3 | John Serbin v. Bora Corp., Ltd. | green | “show that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.