Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Amador Rodriguez Chaidez, A/K/A Rodriguez Amador Chaidez and Amador Rodriguez.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Amador Rodriguez Chaidez, A/K/A Rodriguez Amador Chaidez and Amador Rodriguez Anchor | green | “including 'both the characteristics of the accused and the details of the interrogation.” | 6 |
| 2 | United States v. Amador Rodriguez Chaidez, A/K/A Rodriguez Amador Chaidez and Amador Rodriguez | green | “both the characteristics of the accused and the details of the interrogation.” | 5 |
| 3 | United States v. Michael Leon Bradley | green | “consent is voluntary if it was 'the product of an essentially free and unconstrained choice by its maker, rather than the product of duress or coercion, express or implied.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.