Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re Margaret J. Myers, Debtor. Margaret J. Myers.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re Margaret J. Myers, Debtor. Margaret J. Myers Anchor | green | “whether to annul the automatic stay is a decision committed to the bankruptcy court's discretion, and may be reversed only for abuse of that discretion.” | 6 |
| 2 | New York Guardian Mortgage Corp. v. Dietzel | green | “a set-off for an alleged violation of the truth-in-lending act cannot be asserted as a counter-claim in a mortgage foreclosure action.” | 3 |
| 3 | Rambo v. Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp. (In Re Rambo) | green | “cannot succeed if it is proven that (1) the creditor was fully secured; (2) the transfer was nothing more than a seizure of the secured creditor's collateral; or (3) the unsecured creditors would be paid in full in a chapter 7 case.” | 3 |
| 4 | Norwest Bank Minnesota v. Andrews (In Re Andrews) | green | “the avoidance of the prepetition transfer moots the defendant's request to lift the automatic stay.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.