Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Larry E. Klayman v. Stephanie DeLuca.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Larry E. Klayman v. Stephanie DeLuca Anchor | green | “federal courts have both the inherent power and the constitutional obligation to protect their jurisdiction from conduct which impairs their ability to carry out article iii functions.” | 9 |
| 2 | Cofield v. Ala. Public Service Commission | green | “the district court did not abuse its discretion because the cases were all frivolous.” | 3 |
| 3 | Cofield v. Ala. Public Service Commission | green | “to pay the full filing fees for all future lawsuits and to seek judicial approval for any complaints or papers filed in the future.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.