4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 97 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re CH.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re CH Anchor | green | “just as it is imperative for courts to recognize the constitutional underpinnings of the parent-child relationship, it is also essential that emotional and physical interests of the child not be sacrificed merely to preserve that right.” | 67 |
| 2 | In Re J.O.A. | green | “he endangering conduct may include the parent's actions before the child's birth, while the parent had custody of older children, including evidence of drug usage.” | 16 |
| 3 | In the Interest of E.C.R., Child | green | “many of the reasons supporting termination under subsection o also support the trial court's best interest finding.” | 10 |
| 4 | In Re TN | green | “a parent's engaging in illegal drug activity after agreeing not to do so in a service plan for reunification with her children is sufficient to establish clear and convincing proof of voluntary, deliberate, and conscious conduct that endangered the well-being of her children.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.