Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re W.R. Grace & Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re W.R. Grace & Co. Anchor | green | “left with a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” | 7 |
| 2 | In Re Nortel Networks, Inc. | green | “apply a clearly erroneous standard to integral facts, but exercise plenary review of the court's interpretation and application of those facts to legal precepts.” | 4 |
| 3 | Cheri v. Rolm Company | green | “completely devoid of minimum evidentiary support displaying some hue of credibility” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.