Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from John Doe v. Unocal Corporation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | John Doe v. Unocal Corporation Anchor | green | “the court may consider evidence presented in affidavits to assist it in its determination and may order discovery on the jurisdictional issues.” | 9 |
| 2 | Therese Alexander v. Circus Circus Enterprises, Inc. | green | “may not assume the truth of allegations in a pleading which are contradicted by affidavit.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.