Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Tevein Dewayne Harvey v. Commonwealth of Virginia.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tevein Dewayne Harvey v. Commonwealth of Virginia Anchor | green | “such weighing is left to the discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed on appeal, absent an abuse of discretion.” | 6 |
| 2 | Beck v. Commonwealth | green | “in determining the admissibility of evidence at a sentencing hearing, 'the circumstances of the individual case will dictate what evidence will be necessary and relevant, and from what sources it may be drawn.” | 5 |
| 3 | Tevein Dewayne Harvey v. Commonwealth of Virginia | green | “circuit court judges are vested with broad discretion in admitting evidence and can be expected to exercise that discretion to exclude evidence that does not aid the court in the sentencing phase.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.