Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hoerner Boxes, Inc. v. MESC.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hoerner Boxes, Inc. v. MESC Anchor | green | “the board's findings of fact are conclusive if supported by substantial evidence and without fraud.” | 5 |
| 2 | Richardson v. Employment SEC. Com'n | green | “in any judicial proceedings under this section, the findings of the board of review as to the facts, if supported by evidence and in the absence of fraud, shall be conclusive, and the jurisdiction of said court shall be confined to questions of law.” | 4 |
| 3 | Allen v. MISSISSIPPI EMP. SEC. COM'N | green | “this court must not reweigh the facts of the case or insert its judgment for that of the agency.” | 4 |
| 4 | Allen v. MISSISSIPPI EMP. SEC. COM'N | green | “must not reweigh the facts of the case or insert its judgment for that of the agency.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.