Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Eiland v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Eiland v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp. Anchor | green | “the decision to grant or deny a motion for new trial ... rests in the sound discretion of the trial judge” | 4 |
| 2 | N. Cypress Med. Ctr. Operating Co. v. Aetna Life Ins. Co. | green | “substantial evidence is more than a scintilla, less than a preponderance, and is such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.” | 4 |
| 3 | Malcolm Kelso v. Christine Butler | green | “credibility determinations, the weighing of evidence, and the drawing of legitimate inferences from the facts” | 4 |
| 4 | Connecticut General Life Insurance Co. v. Humble Surgical Hospital, L.L.C. | green | “when evaluating the sufficiency of the evidence, courts view all evidence and draw all reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the verdict.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.