Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Charles Smalley v. Shapiro & Burson, LLP.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Charles Smalley v. Shapiro & Burson, LLP Anchor | green | “under the rooker-feldman doctrine, a 'party losing in state court is barred from seeking what in substance would be appellate review of the state judgment in a united states district court.” | 8 |
| 2 | Vern T. Jordahl v. Democratic Party Of Virginia | green | “with the exception of habeas corpus actions, from sitting in direct review of state court decisions.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.