Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Uncle Henry's Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Plaut Consulting Co., Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant, Edgewing, a Division of Plaut Consulting Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Uncle Henry's Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Plaut Consulting Co., Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant, Edgewing, a Division of Plaut Consulting Inc. Anchor | green | “summary judgment is warranted 'if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of …” | 9 |
| 2 | Carcieri v. Norton | green | “an issue is 'genuine' for purposes of summary judgment if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party, and a 'material fact' is one which might affect the outcome of the suit under the governing law.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.